| Auto Recall Date: |
MAY 24, 1995 |
| Vehicle Component: |
SEAT BELTS:FRONT:BUCKLE ASSEMBLY |
| Model Affected |
LASER |
| Estimated Vehicles Affected: |
920000
Recall Details
|
Auto Recall Date:
MAY 24, 1995
Vehicle Component:
SEAT BELTS:FRONT:BUCKLE ASSEMBLY
Estimated Vehicles Affected:
920000
Model Affected
1990 PLYMOUTH LASER
1990 Plymouth Laser Defect Summary:
THE FRONT SAFETY BELT BUCKLE RELEASE BUTTONS CAN BREAK. THESE RED PLASTIC RELEASE BUTTONS ARE MARKED "PRESS." IF A BUTTON BREAKS, PIECES CAN FALL INTO THE BUCKLE ASSEMBLY CAUSING THE BUCKLE TO OPERATE IMPROPERLY.
Defect Consequence:
THE SAFETY BELTS WOULD NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION TO AN OCCUPANT IN A VEHICLE CRASH.
Remedy:
OWNERS SHOULD PROMPTLY CHECK THE CONDITION AND OPERATION OF BOTH FRONT SAFETY BELT BUCKLES AND CAREFULLY INSPECT THE RED RELEASE BUTTON FOR ANY BREAKS OR CRACKS. THEY SHOULD ENSURE THAT BOTH BUCKLES ARE OPERATING PROPERLY BY INSERTING EACH LATCH PLATE INTO ITS BUCKLE, TUGGING ON THE BELT TO MAKE SURE THE LATCH IS SECURELY LOCKED, AND THEN PRESSING THE RELEASE BUTTON. THE LATCH PLATE SHOULD POP OUT OF THE BUCKLE WHEN THE BUTTON IS PRESSED. IF EITHER RELEASE BUTTON SHOWS A SIGN OF BREAKING OR CRACKING OR IF EITHER BUCKLE FAILS TO OPERATE PROPERLY, OWNERS SHOULD PROMPTLY CONTACT THEIR AUTHORIZED DEALER TO SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT TO HAVE THE BUCKLE REPLACED OR REPAIRED, FREE OF CHARGE. THE MANUFACTURER IS DEVELOPING A REMEDY DESIGNED TO PREVENT FAILURE OF THE BUTTONS THAT ARE NOT CURRENTLY BROKEN.
Estimated Vehicles Affected:
920000
Notes:
CHRYSLER CORPORATION
| Auto Recall Date: |
MAR 21, 1990 |
| Vehicle Component: |
VISIBILITY:SUN ROOF ASSEMBLY |
| Model Affected |
LASER |
| Estimated Vehicles Affected: |
265
Recall Details
|
Auto Recall Date:
MAR 21, 1990
Vehicle Component:
VISIBILITY:SUN ROOF ASSEMBLY
Estimated Vehicles Affected:
265
Model Affected
1990 PLYMOUTH LASER
1990 Plymouth Laser Defect Summary:
OPERATION OF SUNROOF IN "NON-STANDARD" MANNER MAY CAUSE MALE HINGE DISENGAGEMENT FROM THE ROOF HINGE RECEIVER.
Defect Consequence:
THE SUNROOF GLASS COULD DETACH FROM THE ROOF AND RESULTIN INJURY TO OCCUPANTS OR PERSONS IN THE VICINITY, ESPECIALLY IF THIS OCCURS WHILE THE VEHICLE IS IN MOTION.
Remedy:
REPLACE MALE HINGE WITH A MODIFIED VERSION TO INCREASE ROOF HINGE RECEIVER RETENTION ABILITY.
Estimated Vehicles Affected:
265
Notes:
CHRYSLER CORPORATION
| Auto Recall Date: |
JUL 31, 1989 |
| Vehicle Component: |
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:WIRING |
| Model Affected |
LASER |
| Estimated Vehicles Affected: |
5510
Recall Details
|
Auto Recall Date:
JUL 31, 1989
Vehicle Component:
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:WIRING
Estimated Vehicles Affected:
5510
Model Affected
1990 PLYMOUTH LASER
1990 Plymouth Laser Defect Summary:
WIRING HARNESS FOR THE HEADLAMPS MAY BREAK DUE TO THE STRESS CREATED BY THE HEADLAMP POP UP DEVICES.
Defect Consequence:
BREAKAGE OF THE WIRING HARNESS CAUSES LOSS OFHEADLAMP ILLUMINATION WHICH COULD HAVE A POTENTIAL FOR AN ACCIDENT.
Remedy:
HEADLAMP WIRING HARNESS ROUTING WILL BE MODIFIED AND DAMAGED WIRES REPAIRED.
Estimated Vehicles Affected:
5510
Notes:
DIAMOND-STAR MOTORS
| Auto Recall Date: |
JUN 01, 1990 |
| Vehicle Component: |
VISIBILITY:WINDSHIELD |
| Model Affected |
LASER |
| Estimated Vehicles Affected: |
184
Recall Details
|
Auto Recall Date:
JUN 01, 1990
Vehicle Component:
VISIBILITY:WINDSHIELD
Estimated Vehicles Affected:
184
Model Affected
1990 PLYMOUTH LASER
1990 Plymouth Laser Defect Summary:
DILUTED PRIMER MAY HAVE BEEN USED ON THE WINDSHIELD OPENING FLANGES PRIOR TO WINDSHIELD GLASS INSTALLATION WHICH WOULD NOT PROVIDE THE RETENTION REQUIRED BY FMVSS 212.
Defect Consequence:
WINDSHIELDS WOULD NOT PREVENT EJECTION OF VEHICLEOCCUPANTS DURING A VEHICLE CRASH, WHICH CAUSES SERIOUS INJURIES AND FATALITIES.
Remedy:
REPLACE WINDSHIELDS, ASSOCIATED PARTS, AND PRIMER.
Estimated Vehicles Affected:
184
Notes:
CHRYSLER CORPORATION